The easiest way to waste time looking for indie games is to start with “indie” as if it were a genre. It is not a useful enough filter on its own. A tiny tactics game, a cozy farming sim, a brutal platformer and a surreal story game can all sit under the same broad label while having almost nothing in common as play experiences.
A better approach is to decide what kind of session you want, then use store discovery tools to narrow the field. Steam's tag system is useful here because products can carry specific community-applied descriptors such as turn-based, deckbuilding, colony sim, puzzle, relaxing or local co-op. The goal is not to find the indie game everybody is talking about. It is to make a short list that matches how you actually want to play.
Start with two useful constraints, not a giant genre
Pick one constraint about what you do and one about how you want it to feel. “Strategy” is broad; “turn-based tactics + short sessions” is a much better brief. “Adventure” is broad; “exploration + relaxing” gives a store or recommendation system more to work with.
Steam's popular-tags browser shows how granular these labels can become, and it also surfaces tags recommended from games a signed-in user has recently played. Use that granularity rather than scrolling an endless “Indie” category. If a tag keeps producing games you do not want, remove it and replace it with something that describes the missing ingredient.
There is a trade-off. Community tags are discovery aids, not guarantees. A game can be tagged in ways that reflect only part of its design, and popular labels can be too broad to settle a purchase decision. Once a title reaches your shortlist, read its store description, look at the screenshots or trailer, and check the features that matter to you rather than treating the tags as a verdict.
Make the recommendation system do some work
Steam's current home-page tools include a personalised Discovery Queue, and Valve has refreshed that experience so players can browse recommendations with quick visual previews. That makes the queue more useful as a deliberate sampling tool: move through a batch, pay attention to the few titles that actually match your constraints, and ignore the urge to save everything that merely looks interesting for ten seconds.
The useful habit is comparison. If three recommendations all look close, ask which one best satisfies your original brief. Do you want something playable in short bursts? Is co-op essential? Do you care more about mechanical depth or story? Those questions are boring compared with a viral clip, but they are much better at preventing a library full of games you admired more than you wanted to play.
Wishlists can then become a holding area rather than a commitment. A title can stay there until you have a reason to move it up: a demo appears, a friend wants to play, the release version changes materially, or you simply finish something else in the same niche.
The recommendation is simple: search by the experience you want, not by the hype around a game. Use specific tags to create a candidate list, use the Discovery Queue to find options outside the obvious bestsellers, then judge the finalists against two or three criteria that matter to you. Viral popularity can be a useful signal that something is happening. It is a poor substitute for knowing what you want to play tonight.
Reporting notes